Technologies and molecules targeting brain networks: rapidly growing markets
The clinical potential of therapeutic approaches targeting brain connectivity is already reflected in strong market momentum. Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) represented a USD 1.61 billion market in 2025 (Precedence Research, 2024), while Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) revenues reached USD 806 million, with annual growth rates exceeding 10%. More than 244,000 patients have already received a DBS implant across all indications.
In parallel, pharmacological approaches exploring the effects of psychedelic substances constitute a market estimated at USD 2.2 billion in 2024, projected to reach nearly USD 9 billion by 2034. Some of these molecules act through mechanisms of neuronal plasticity, directly modulating the connectivity of networks involved in neuropsychiatric conditions.
When the brain becomes complex… and vulnerable
To understand how these therapeutic strategies can target specific circuits, it is essential to revisit what makes the human brain both exceptional and fragile. The human brain stands out among species due to the richness and density of its neuronal connections. The expansion of the cerebral cortex—a key region for higher cognitive functions such as language, memory, perception, and consciousness—is a major factor. In humans, this layer is particularly thick and contains nearly 16 billion neurons, twice as many as in chimpanzees and more than ten times as many as in macaques. The human cortex also contains a higher proportion of glial cells—astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and microglia—which provide metabolic support, enable myelination, and regulate neuronal activity (for more on the role of glial cells, see our dedicated article!). Their functional role, long underestimated, is now recognized as central to network balance and plasticity.
Beyond sheer numbers, the structure of human neurons further reinforces this complexity: denser arborizations, more numerous connections, and therefore the ability to process larger volumes of information more rapidly. These features contribute to the high cognitive performance of our species.
Finally, this complexity results from an atypical development of neuronal connectivity in humans during childhood: slower, more prolonged, and more conducive to the emergence of sophisticated networks. This extended development supports the formation of more diverse and adaptable circuits, but also makes them more sensitive to disruptions, particularly during critical periods of neurodevelopment.
This remarkable architecture, which enables advanced mental functions, also creates a landscape where vulnerabilities are revealed by neuropsychiatric disorders.
What brain connectivity tells us about neuropsychiatric disorders
What if neuropsychiatric disorders were not solely defined by observable symptoms, but instead reflected measurable dysfunctions in neuronal networks? Across disorders such as autism, schizophrenia, epilepsy, and depression, research highlights specific imbalances between brain networks—often detectable from childhood and sometimes measurable down to the molecular level. These alterations become functional markers—and potentially therapeutic targets.
Epilepsy: a sustained imbalance between excitation and inhibition at the circuit level
Far from being merely a localized focus of abnormal activity, epilepsy is now understood as a disorder of brain networks. The imbalance between excitation and inhibition lies at the core of the condition, particularly within thalamo-cortical circuits, where insufficient inhibition enables the emergence of synchronized neuronal hyperactivity.
At the molecular level, several dysfunctions contribute to this hyperexcitability by affecting the systems that normally regulate neuronal activity. Key mechanisms include the overactivation of glutamate receptors (AMPA, NMDA), deficits in GABAergic interneurons, ion channel dysfunctions, and neuroinflammation.
Autism: under-connected sensory networks and an overactive default mode
Autism is characterized by a distinct brain organization in which connectivity between regions does not follow typical developmental patterns. Large-scale functional imaging reveals hypoconnectivity in sensory and attentional circuits, alongside hyperconnectivity of the default mode network (DMN)—the network active at rest—with other cortical and subcortical regions. These imbalances are directly correlated with the severity of social and cognitive symptoms. From early childhood, a reduction in the density of physical connections between regions can be detected, suggesting that these alterations are established very early in development.
These observations position connectivity as a central biomarker of autism and potentially as a lever for targeted intervention on affected networks. For instance, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is being tested for its therapeutic effect on long-range connectivity reorganization in individuals with autism specter disorder (ASD). Other interventions, such as neurofeedback, demonstrated in a clinical trial involving ASD children the potential to regulate connectivity and temporal variability in specific brain regions, although further validation of these results is required. It should be noted, however, that these neurobiological approaches do not replace individualized psychological and educational support, which remains a cornerstone of effective care pathways.
Brain connectivity and neuropsychiatric disorders: distinct signatures across conditions
Psychiatric disorders such as depression and schizophrenia are often associated with specific disruptions in brain networks. For instance, studies have shown desynchronization between the insula and the prefrontal cortex in depression, as well as hyperconnectivity of the default mode network in schizophrenia, which may contribute to the intrusion of internal thoughts.
These findings help better characterize the diversity of patient profiles in neuropsychiatric conditions and support the idea that certain patient subtypes may benefit from more targeted approaches. As with autism, these biological markers are meaningful only if their measurement is integrated into a comprehensive care strategy that considers the patient’s life trajectory and includes long-term psychological support.
Opportunities for developing future treatments for neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders
Neurostimulation approaches
Neurostimulation approaches offer concrete therapeutic opportunities to modulate brain connectivity in a targeted manner.
- In refractory epilepsy, stimulation of the anterior thalamic nucleus has demonstrated sustained effects in reducing seizures. Pre-treatment network analysis now enables optimization of electrode placement, including outside seizure onset zones, by targeting key nodes within the circuit. The response also depends on the dynamic state of the network and its ability to reorganize over time.
- In depression, functional MRI-guided transcranial stimulation has helped restore the influence of the prefrontal cortex on the insula, with significant symptom improvement reported in one study.
- In schizophrenia, parietal or prefrontal stimulation strengthens connectivity and helps alleviate cognitive and negative symptoms.
These results may explain the growing interest in personalized strategies based on mapping altered networks, enabling the design of more targeted, better-tolerated, and more effective interventions.
“Neuro-plastic” molecular approaches
Some molecules under development aim to modulate brain connectivity through mechanisms of neuronal plasticity. While their effects remain variable, several results are promising.
- Psilocybin temporarily reduces the coherence of the default mode network (DMN), an effect associated with rapid improvement in treatment-resistant depressive symptoms.
- Ketamine also acts on interactions between the hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, and the DMN, with demonstrated clinical benefits in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).
- Bumetanide, tested in autism, modulates the GABA/glutamate ratio in key regions such as the insula and visual cortex, with modest social effects observed in targeted trials.
- Intranasal oxytocin, also evaluated in autism, influences social cognition networks, although clinical data remain mixed.
These approaches illustrate the potential of neuroplastic interventions to target specific functional networks. Their effectiveness may, however, depend on improved patient stratification based on connectivity profiles, biological markers, or developmental trajectories. More personalized trial designs could therefore help fully unlock their therapeutic potential.
A detailed understanding of brain connectivity opens up new avenues to understand, characterize, and treat neurological and psychiatric disorders. It moves beyond symptom-based approaches by identifying functional signatures specific to each condition—and potentially to each patient. This shift toward a “network-based” understanding of the brain is transforming the standards of therapeutic development.
In this context, healthcare industry stakeholders have a key role to play: integrating these insights to refine patient selection criteria, stratify clinical trial populations based on neurofunctional profiles, and develop personalized therapies. At Alcimed, we support you in integrating these advances into your R&D roadmaps, identifying the most promising targets, and adapting your therapeutic development strategies to the new standards of precision medicine. Do not hesitate to contact our team.
About the author,
Joseph, Consultant in Alcimed’s Healthcare team in France